Fennemore
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Client Service
    • Culture
    • Orange Dot
    • History
    • Belonging & Inclusion
    • Leadership
    • Innovation
  • People
  • Services
  • Insights
    • View All Insights
    • Media Hits
    • In the News
    • Awards
    • Videos
  • Careers
    • Careers Home
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Students
    • 2026 Summer Associates
    • Learning & Development
    • Fennemore Forward
  • Locations
  • Make A Payment
  • Home
  • Insights
  • Articles

Articles

Select Insights
  • In the News
  • Awards
  • Videos
  • AdobeStock 462413177 First District Court Rules California’s Validation Law Is Mandatory and Jurisdictional in Reverse Validation Actions

    On appeal to the First District Court, plaintiffs argued that the city had waived the validation requirements by litigating the case and that their actions were timely. The court held that the validation statutes were mandatory and jurisdictional for challenges to water rates, and plaintiffs’ failure to comply with statutory procedures. Backgroun…

    Read More
  • AdobeStock 664428478 Public Land, Canceled Shares: First District Court Upholds Mutual Water Company Stock Rule

    The First District California Court of Appeal has upheld a statutory rule that requires mutual water companies to cancel “appurtenant” shares held by public entities. The court rejected a constitutional challenge by City of Clearlake (City). This decision clarifies that public ownership of land served by a mutual water company does not necessar…

    Read More
  • AdobeStock 665213853 Use, Not Risk: California Supreme Court Clarifies CEQA’s Class 1 Exemption

    Sunflower Alliance v. Department of Conservation et al., Reabold California, LLC, Real Party in Interest and Appellant, was decided by the California Supreme Court on June 25, 2026. The Court held that “negligible or no expansion of existing or former use” in the California Environmental Quality Act’s Class 1 categorical exemption refers to t…

    Read More
  • AdobeStock 618534180 After Ames: What HR Needs to Know About Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

    In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court made one point unmistakable: Title VII protects everyone on equal terms, whether the individual belongs to a perceived majority or minority group. The decision changes the litigation standard in courts that had imposed an additional burden on majority-group plaintiffs. But it shou…

    Read More
  • AdobeStock 1776622380 NIL Changed the Money Timeline. Athlete Planning Needs to Catch Up.

    If a young athlete earns life-changing money at 18 or 19 years old, who is actually responsible for helping that athlete preserve it, protect it and build something lasting from it? That was NBA champion and Finals MVP Jaylen Brown’s question when he recently criticized the traditional athlete advisory model. Is the sports industry still introduc…

    Read More
  • AdobeStock 2069373882 California’s New UCC Law Puts Lenders’ Perfection in Collateral at Risk

    California has enacted Assembly Bill 501, which will materially change the procedures governing allegedly unauthorized financing statements when it takes effect on January 1, 2027. A missed notice could put a lender’s perfected security interest in collateral at risk. Understanding how this new law applies, and how notices reach the people respon…

    Read More
Show More Articles
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Notices
  • Policy Menu Page
  • California Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Policy Page
  • Cookie Settings
  • En Español
  • Pay My Bill

© 2026 Fennemore Craig, P.C.