Client Alerts
Client alerts
-
New U.S. Tariffs Replace Expiring Section 122 Tariffs
By LES GLICK, CO- CHAIR INTERNATIONAL TRADE PRACTICE GROUP, LGLICK@FENNEMORELAW.COM WASHINGTON, D.C. tel-; 240-447-7796 With the expiration of President Trump’s 10% tariff imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 on July 24, 2026, U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer, at the direction of President Trump, took final ac…
Read More -
Washington State Human Rights Commission v. Summerwalk Homeowners’ Association
Wash. State Human Rights Comm’n v. Summerwalk Homeowners’ Ass’n, No. 61643-2-II (Wash. Ct. App. Div. II July 21, 2026). Decided July 21, 2026 Washington Extends Fair Housing Protections to HOA Covenant Enforcement After Closing In a published decision issued July 21, 2026, Division II of the Washington Court of Appeals resolved a …
Read More -
Colorado’s Job Posting Rules Have Teeth: What Employers Need to Know About EPEWA Part 2
Article Highlights Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (EPEWA), Part 2, is no longer just a pay transparency law. It is a job opportunity transparency law. For covered employers, the law requires more than posting salary ranges. It also requires internal notice of job opportunities, post-selection notices after a candidate is chosen, career p…
Read More -
From Stay to Award: Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Court Jurisdiction After Arbitration
The U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, 608 U.S. ___ (2026), answers a narrow but important arbitration question: when a federal court with jurisdiction over a lawsuit stays the lawsuit under § 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), can that court confirm or vacate the arbitration award even if the…
Read More -
Supreme Court Immigration Update: Border Asylum Access, TPS for Haiti and Syria, and Employer Next Steps
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued two immigration decisions with practical consequences for asylum access, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), and employer work authorization compliance. In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the Court held that a person waiting on the Mexico side of the U.S.-Mexico border has not “arrived in the United States”…
Read More -
Client Alert: Federal Court Vacates $100K H-1B Payment Requirement
On June 8, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts vacated the policy implementing the $100,000 payment requirement, restoring, at least for now, a more predictable filing landscape for H-1B petitions. In State of California et al. v. Mullin et al., Judge Leo T. Sorokin granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs and vacated …
Read More
